diff --git a/ontologies/MissionExecutionOntology3.1-DADM.owl b/ontologies/MissionExecutionOntology3.1-DADM.owl
index 5c4eb554183d56372201c66f47735f39fec198d8..bbad4c36a898d46a18a504450558bc2a9ed6a272 100644
--- a/ontologies/MissionExecutionOntology3.1-DADM.owl
+++ b/ontologies/MissionExecutionOntology3.1-DADM.owl
@@ -17,85 +17,85 @@
<Class IRI="#Constraint"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.1"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.2"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.3"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.4"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM04"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.6"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM06"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM07"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM08"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM10"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM11"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM12"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#DADM13_CivilNaturalRights"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM13"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
@@ -182,220 +182,220 @@
<Class IRI="#PostOperationAnalyticsConstraint"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.d_SameDefinitions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.1a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.2a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.3a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.4a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.f"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.g"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.h"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.i"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1f"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1g"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1h"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1i"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1j"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1k"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1l"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1m"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1n"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1o"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1p"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1q"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1r"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1s"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3f"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3g"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3h"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4f"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4g"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4h"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4i"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4j"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5c"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5d"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5e"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5f"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5g"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5h"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5i"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5j"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5k"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.6a"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.6b"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1a"/>
@@ -640,6 +640,10 @@
<Declaration>
<DataProperty IRI="/version"/>
</Declaration>
+ <EquivalentClasses>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4a"/>
+ </EquivalentClasses>
<EquivalentClasses>
<Class IRI="#EndCondition"/>
<ObjectUnionOf>
@@ -696,111 +700,111 @@
</ObjectMinCardinality>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.1"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.2"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.3"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability"/>
- <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.4"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM04"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05_CommandControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.6"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM06"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM07"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM08"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming"/>
- <Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM10"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM11"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM12"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#DADM13_CivilNaturalRights"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM13"/>
<Class IRI="#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
@@ -1062,460 +1066,456 @@
<Class IRI="#Constraint"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
- </SubClassOf>
- <SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.d_SameDefinitions"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE01.e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM01"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.1a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.2a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.3a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE02.4a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM02.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.f"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.g"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.h"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE03.i"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM03"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1f"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1g"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1h"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1i"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1j"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1k"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1l"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1m"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1n"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1o"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1p"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1q"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1r"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.1s"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.2d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3f"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3g"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.3h"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4f"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4g"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4h"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4i"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.4j"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5c"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5d"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5e"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5f"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5g"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5h"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5i"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5j"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.5k"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.5"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.6a"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.6"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
- <Class IRI="#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl"/>
+ <Class IRI="#RE05.6b"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM05.6"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1a"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1b"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1c"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1d"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1e"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1f"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1g"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1h"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1i"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1j"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.1k"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.1"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2a"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2b"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2c"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2d"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2e"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2f"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2g"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2h"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2i"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2j"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2k"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2l"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2m"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2n"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2o"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2p"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.2q"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.2"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3a"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3b"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3c"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3d"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3e"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.3f"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.3"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4a"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4b"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4c"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4d"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4e"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4f"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4g"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RE09.4h"/>
- <Class IRI="#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions"/>
+ <Class IRI="#DADM09.4"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
<Class IRI="#RehearsalConstraint"/>
@@ -2093,332 +2093,332 @@
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM01</IRI>
<Literal>Are all parties (developers, decision-makers, commanders, and operators) using a common and agreed-upon IAS lexicon so as not to inadvertently introduce risk via miscommunication?
As the number of organizations developing IAS grows, the need for common definitions and consistency in the semantics that characterize IAS concepts also grows. The main objective of this DADM is to identify terms that, if misunderstood or miscommunicated, could lead to increased risk in the use of an IAS. It is especially important for all persons involved in the life cycle of an IAS (e.g., designers, developers, operators) to take a consistent approach in defining the terms to prevent risks that can inadvertently result in mishaps. Terms that require particular attention are those that are highly subjective and strongly depend on user interpretation and situational context. Consistency is not only important among the different people involved but also across the different phases of military operations. Having standard semantics and concepts may not completely eliminate risk, but reduces the risk of the operator misusing an IAS because of a miscommunication of the designer's original intention.</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM01</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM01</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM01</IRI>
<Literal>page 16, page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM02</IRI>
+ <Literal>For every point in time during an operation, and for every component that may be used16 during that operation, is there a human who understands how the component functions, is aware of any autonomous functionality within the component, understands the risks associated with its use, and is legally accountable for authorizing its use?
+Autonomous functionality can exist in every link of the kill chain, not just at the pinnacle of the decision to apply lethal force. Similarly, autonomous functionality can exist in every precursor activity of a nonlethal autonomous decision aid. Perceived gaps in accountability magnify legal and ethical concerns in the debate on IAS. Ensuring the continuity of legal accountability through every phase of an operation and amongst every interaction between the subcomponents of the overall IAS can help alleviate these concerns.</Literal>
+ </AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
+ <IRI>#DADM02</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability</Literal>
+ </AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
+ <IRI>#DADM02</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 16, page 60</Literal>
+ </AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.1</IRI>
<Literal>Pre-operational phase considerations</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM02.1</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.1</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.1</IRI>
<Literal>page 60</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM02.2</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.2</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.2</IRI>
<Literal>page 61</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM02.3</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.3</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.3</IRI>
<Literal>page 61-62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM02.4</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.4</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM02.4</IRI>
<Literal>page 62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability</IRI>
- <Literal>For every point in time during an operation, and for every component that may be used16 during that operation, is there a human who understands how the component functions, is aware of any autonomous functionality within the component, understands the risks associated with its use, and is legally accountable for authorizing its use?
-Autonomous functionality can exist in every link of the kill chain, not just at the pinnacle of the decision to apply lethal force. Similarly, autonomous functionality can exist in every precursor activity of a nonlethal autonomous decision aid. Perceived gaps in accountability magnify legal and ethical concerns in the debate on IAS. Ensuring the continuity of legal accountability through every phase of an operation and amongst every interaction between the subcomponents of the overall IAS can help alleviate these concerns.</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM03</IRI>
+ <Literal>Can the degree of autonomous functionality be adjusted to accommodate different or changing degrees of risk tolerance?
+The degree of autonomy exists on a spectrum from zero autonomy, in which a human executes all functions, up to full autonomy, in which an IAS executes all functions. Increasing the degree of a system's autonomy can increase the risk of an unintended negative consequence. Additionally, changes in risk tolerance come with changing situations, conditions, and commanders in any dynamic operational environment. Thus, it is advantageous to have the ability to adjust the degree of autonomous functionality to match different risk tolerances, reducing it when risk tolerance is low and increasing it when risk tolerance is high.</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM02</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM03</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM03_DegreeAutonomy</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability</IRI>
- <Literal>page 16, page 60</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM03</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 17, page 62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>Can the degree of autonomous functionality be adjusted to accommodate different or changing degrees of risk tolerance?
-The degree of autonomy exists on a spectrum from zero autonomy, in which a human executes all functions, up to full autonomy, in which an IAS executes all functions. Increasing the degree of a system's autonomy can increase the risk of an unintended negative consequence. Additionally, changes in risk tolerance come with changing situations, conditions, and commanders in any dynamic operational environment. Thus, it is advantageous to have the ability to adjust the degree of autonomous functionality to match different risk tolerances, reducing it when risk tolerance is low and increasing it when risk tolerance is high.</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM04</IRI>
+ <Literal>Does use of the IAS impart a military advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system, to include reducing the probability of collateral damage, that justifies accepting the potential risks associated with the use of the IAS?
+The role of autonomy is to extend and complement human capabilities, and it is especially valuable in situations that are "dull, dirty, or dangerous." Autonomous functionalities also become necessary when an IAS can perform tasks more effectively, such as decision-making at speeds beyond human capability, and when an IAS can help prevent cognitive overload. Ultimately, the potential risks that come with the use of an IAS are justified if an IAS provides a clear advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system. However, if both perform similarly, then the user may opt to use the non-autonomous system to reduce the risks regarding legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of an IAS (when and if these risks are not also present in the non-autonomous alternative).</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM03</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM04</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM04_NecessityAutonomy</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>page 17, page 62</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM04</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 17, page 64</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>Does use of the IAS impart a military advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system, to include reducing the probability of collateral damage, that justifies accepting the potential risks associated with the use of the IAS?
-The role of autonomy is to extend and complement human capabilities, and it is especially valuable in situations that are “dull, dirty, or dangerous.�? Autonomous functionalities also become necessary when an IAS can perform tasks more effectively, such as decision-making at speeds beyond human capability, and when an IAS can help prevent cognitive overload. Ultimately, the potential risks that come with the use of an IAS are justified if an IAS provides a clear advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system. However, if both perform similarly, then the user may opt to use the non-autonomous system to reduce the risks regarding legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of an IAS (when and if these risks are not also present in the non-autonomous alternative).</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05</IRI>
+ <Literal>Has every available and practicable measure been taken by the commander to; prevent loss of command and control, relinquish command and control (but not accountability) only in the most dire of circumstances where no other option is available, ensure transfer of command and control without its loss, detect and prevent unintended behaviors, deactivate systems that demonstrate unintended behavior, i.e. to fail safe when command and control is lost, and re-establish command and control as quickly and safely as possible when it is lost due to error, miscommunication, malfunction or enemy action?
+
+One major concern with IAS is that in some critical circumstances command and control may be difficult or impossible. This DAD seeks to maintain command and control of the IAS to the greatest extent possible and practicable, mitigate against negative consequences when command and control is lost, and minimize but accept the situations where the commander must transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The risk elements under this DAD allow the commander to make a risk-informed decision to transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The commander thus remains accountable for any negative consequences that may result.</Literal>
+ </AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:isDefinedBy"/>
+ <IRI>#DADM05</IRI>
+ <Literal>Michael Holihan</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM04</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05_CommandControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy</IRI>
- <Literal>page 17, page 64</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 18, page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.1</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.1</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.1</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.2</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.2</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:seeAlso"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.2</IRI>
<Literal>TODO Check DADM naming rules for "the, and," etc.,
Also document rules for TODO statements.</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.2</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.3</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.3</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.3</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.4</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.4</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.4</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.5</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.5</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.5</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05.6</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.6</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM05.6</IRI>
<Literal>page 71</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05_CommandControl</IRI>
- <Literal>Has every available and practicable measure been taken by the commander to; prevent loss of command and control, relinquish command and control (but not accountability) only in the most dire of circumstances where no other option is available, ensure transfer of command and control without its loss, detect and prevent unintended behaviors, deactivate systems that demonstrate unintended behavior, i.e. to fail safe when command and control is lost, and re-establish command and control as quickly and safely as possible when it is lost due to error, miscommunication, malfunction or enemy action?
-
-One major concern with IAS is that in some critical circumstances command and control may be difficult or impossible. This DAD seeks to maintain command and control of the IAS to the greatest extent possible and practicable, mitigate against negative consequences when command and control is lost, and minimize but accept the situations where the commander must transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The risk elements under this DAD allow the commander to make a risk-informed decision to transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The commander thus remains accountable for any negative consequences that may result.</Literal>
- </AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:isDefinedBy"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05_CommandControl</IRI>
- <Literal>Michael Holihan</Literal>
- </AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05_CommandControl</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM05</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM06</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM05_CommandControl</IRI>
- <Literal>page 18, page 67</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM06</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 18, page 71</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM06</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM07</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects</IRI>
- <Literal>page 18, page 71</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM07</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 19, page 78</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM07</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM08</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs</IRI>
- <Literal>page 19, page 78</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM08</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 19, page 82</Literal>
+ </AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationAssertion>
+ <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:isDefinedBy"/>
+ <IRI>#DADM09</IRI>
+ <Literal>Garrett Cookson</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM08</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs</IRI>
- <Literal>page 19, page 82</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09</IRI>
+ <Literal>page 19, page 85</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM09.1</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.1</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.1</IRI>
<Literal>page 85</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM09.2</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.2</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.2</IRI>
<Literal>page 85, page 86</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM09.3</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.3</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.3</IRI>
<Literal>page 87</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM09.4</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.4</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM09.4</IRI>
<Literal>page 87, page 88</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:isDefinedBy"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming</IRI>
- <Literal>Garrett Cookson</Literal>
- </AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM09</Literal>
- </AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationAssertion>
- <AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming</IRI>
- <Literal>page 19, page 85</Literal>
- </AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM10</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM10</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM10</IRI>
<Literal>page 20, page 88</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM11</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM11</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM11</IRI>
<Literal>page 21, page 90</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM12</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM12</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM12</IRI>
<Literal>page 21, page 93</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#DADM13_CivilNaturalRights</IRI>
- <Literal>DADM13</Literal>
+ <IRI>#DADM13</IRI>
+ <Literal>DADM13_CivilNaturalRights</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#DADM13_CivilNaturalRights</IRI>
+ <IRI>#DADM13</IRI>
<Literal>page 21, page 94</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
<IRI>#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking</IRI>
<Literal>Abstract
-This study identifies the dimensions of autonomous decision-making (DADMs), namely the categories and causes of potential risk that one should consider before transferring decision-making capabilities to an intelligent autonomous system (IAS). The objective of this study was to provide some of the tools needed to implement existing policies with respect to the legal, ethical, and militarily effective use of IAS. These tools help to identify and either mitigate or accept the risks associated with the use of IAS that might result in a negative outcome. The 13 identified DADMs were developed from a comprehensive list of 565 “risk elements" drawn from hundreds of documents authored by parties in favor of, and opposed to, the use of autonomy technology in weapons systems. We record these elements in the form of a question so that they can be used by the acquisition community to develop requirements documents that ensure the ethical use of autonomous systems, and be used by military commanders as a risk assessment checklist to ensure that autonomous systems are not used in an unethical manner. In this way, the Department of Defense can make fully-informed risk assessment decisions before developing or deploying autonomous systems.</Literal>
+This study identifies the dimensions of autonomous decision-making (DADMs), namely the categories and causes of potential risk that one should consider before transferring decision-making capabilities to an intelligent autonomous system (IAS). The objective of this study was to provide some of the tools needed to implement existing policies with respect to the legal, ethical, and militarily effective use of IAS. These tools help to identify and either mitigate or accept the risks associated with the use of IAS that might result in a negative outcome. The 13 identified DADMs were developed from a comprehensive list of 565 "risk elements" drawn from hundreds of documents authored by parties in favor of, and opposed to, the use of autonomy technology in weapons systems. We record these elements in the form of a question so that they can be used by the acquisition community to develop requirements documents that ensure the ethical use of autonomous systems, and be used by military commanders as a risk assessment checklist to ensure that autonomous systems are not used in an unethical manner. In this way, the Department of Defense can make fully-informed risk assessment decisions before developing or deploying autonomous systems.</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
@@ -2467,1095 +2467,1095 @@ This study identifies the dimensions of autonomous decision-making (DADMs), name
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.a</IRI>
<Literal>Have all parties identified all the important terms being used in the development and use of the IAS that require definition?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse</IRI>
- <Literal>RE01.a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.a</IRI>
<Literal>page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.b</IRI>
<Literal>Are all parties (when they come from different organizations with different doctrine with respect to IAS use) using consistent and non-conflicting doctrinal terminology?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology</IRI>
- <Literal>RE01.b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.b</IRI>
<Literal>page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.c</IRI>
<Literal>Does IAS use require the use of rapidly emerging terminology that must be defined and agreed upon before use?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology</IRI>
- <Literal>RE01.c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.c</IRI>
<Literal>page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.d_SameDefinitions</IRI>
- <Literal>Are all parties using the same definitions for “artificial intelligence,�? “intelligent autonomous systems,�? “autonomy,�? “automatic,�? and “autonomous functionality?�?</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.d</IRI>
+ <Literal>Are all parties using the same definitions for "artificial intelligence," "intelligent autonomous systems," "autonomy," "automatic," and "autonomous functionality?"</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.d_SameDefinitions</IRI>
- <Literal>RE01.d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE01.d_SameDefinitions</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.d_SameDefinitions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.d</IRI>
<Literal>page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions</IRI>
- <Literal>Are all parties using the same definitions for “peacetime status�? and wartime status?�?</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.e</IRI>
+ <Literal>Are all parties using the same definitions for "peacetime status" and "wartime status?"</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions</IRI>
- <Literal>RE01.e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE01.e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE01.e</IRI>
<Literal>page 59</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.1a</IRI>
<Literal>Has the concept of operation been analyzed to verify that no temporal or spatial accountability gaps exist regarding the use of IAS?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps</IRI>
- <Literal>RE02.1a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE02.1a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.1a</IRI>
<Literal>page 60</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.2a</IRI>
<Literal>Does the IAS allow for human judgment to be exercised over the IAS during this phase while complying with the relevant rules of engagement?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment</IRI>
- <Literal>RE02.2a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE02.2a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE02.2a_HumanJudgment</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.2a</IRI>
<Literal>page 61</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.3a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS transfer command and control between entities authorized to exercise this command and control without creating any temporal gaps in accountability?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps</IRI>
- <Literal>RE02.3a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE02.3a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE02.3a_TemporalGaps</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.3a</IRI>
<Literal>page 61</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections</IRI>
- <Literal>Are protections in place to prevent the problem of the “moral buffer,�? where the user mentally transfers accountability for negative consequences to the machine?</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE02.4a</IRI>
+ <Literal>Are protections in place to prevent the problem of the "moral buffer," where the user mentally transfers accountability for negative consequences to the machine?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections</IRI>
- <Literal>RE02.4a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE02.4a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE02.4a</IRI>
<Literal>page 62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of IAS autonomy be adjusted?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.a</IRI>
<Literal>page 62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.b</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of IAS autonomy be made known (through markings or public communications such as a notice to mariners) to supported friendly forces, to noncombatants, and/or to enemy combatants at the discretion of the operator or commander?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.b</IRI>
<Literal>page 62</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.c</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS make it known to anyone who might be in a position to disable, board, or seize it that it has, and will exercise, its universal right to self-defense?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.c</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.d</IRI>
<Literal>Can the commander or operator throttle the IAS to dynamically increase or decrease the degree of autonomy to adjust to the dynamics of the operational situation?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.d</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.e</IRI>
<Literal>Is there an established and accepted threshold degree of autonomy, that when exceeded, the IAS becomes a LAWS, where a human no longer selects the target?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.e</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.f</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of IAS autonomy be conditionally changed, either through predetermined rule sets, or resulting from emergent information not covered by the predetermined rules, such as the elevation of the defense condition (DEFCON)?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.f</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.f</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.f</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.g</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of IAS autonomy for a multi-mission capable platform be chosen and/or adjusted independently for each mission?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.g</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.g</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.g</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.h</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of autonomy for each autonomous function of an IAS be adjusted individually?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.h</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.h</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.h</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.i</IRI>
<Literal>Can the degree of IAS autonomy be selected by the IAS such that it is the lowest degree of autonomy required to accomplish the mission?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable</IRI>
- <Literal>RE03.i</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE03.i</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE03.i</IRI>
<Literal>page 63</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl</IRI>
- <Literal>Can the IAS determine if its (possibly changing) operational environment requires “human-in-the-loop,†“human-on-the-loopâ€, or “human-out-of-the-loop†control and make that requirement known to a human operator?</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1a</IRI>
+ <Literal>Can the IAS determine if its (possibly changing) operational environment requires "human-in-the-loop," "human-on-the-loop", or "human-out-of-the-loop" control and make that requirement known to a human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1a</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1b</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS prohibited from learning and executing new behaviors based on sensor inputs or data feeds received once decision-making capabilities have been transferred to it?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1b</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1c</IRI>
<Literal>If the IAS is allowed to modify its behavior, does it consult the human operator beforehand?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1c</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1d</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS prohibited from initiating operation in the absence of a control link to a human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1d</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1e</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS prohibited from moving to a location where the control link to a human operator can be degraded or lost?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1e</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1f</IRI>
<Literal>Is the human operator still able to provide command and control over the actions of the IAS when it is employed as part of, and can act based on the conditions within, a swarm of other IAS?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1f</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1f</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1f</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop</IRI>
- <Literal>Is the human operator able to choose between a “human in, on, or out of the loop?â€</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1g</IRI>
+ <Literal>Is the human operator able to choose between a "human in, on, or out of the loop?"</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1g</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1g</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1g</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1h</IRI>
<Literal>Does the IAS enable the commander to determine and/or manage the symmetries/asymmetries in the level of complexity between own forces and enemy forces?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1h</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1h</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1h</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1i</IRI>
<Literal>If a situation becomes too complex or unfolds too rapidly for the human operator to comprehend, can the human operator terminate an engagement?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1i</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1i</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1i</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1j</IRI>
<Literal>Are the number of human operators available sufficient to the number of IAS requiring command and control?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1j</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1j</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1j</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1k</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS detect enemy attempts to wrest command and control away and notify the human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1k</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1k</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1k</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1l</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS detect malfunctions or out of tolerance performance conditions that could result in a loss of command and control and notify the human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1l</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1l</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1l</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1m</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS constantly monitor the availability of a control link, even when not under the direct and immediate direction of the human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1m</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1m</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1m</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1n</IRI>
<Literal>Can an IAS operating in a passive mode be prohibited from changing to an active mode of operation absent a direct instruction to do so by a human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1n</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1n</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1n</IRI>
<Literal>page 67</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1o</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS engage an emergent target, not on any preplanned list, without validation from a human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1o</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1o</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1o</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1p</IRI>
<Literal>Can the human operator choose to reject automated decision-making capabilities at their own discretion and at any time?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1p</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1p</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1p</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1q</IRI>
<Literal>Can the human operator select a minimum confidence level that must be attained before the IAS can act without approval?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1q</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1q</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1q</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1r</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS be made to have to check in with a human operator and be in receipt of an acknowledgement before proceeding with further actions?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1r</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1r</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1r</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1s</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS identify conditions that might cause it to lose access to the control link with the human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.1s</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1s</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.1s</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the commander selectively limit the actions that an IAS can take before relinquishing command and control over it?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.2a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2a</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2b</IRI>
<Literal>Does the commander have a checklist of conditions that must be met, risk mitigation steps that have been taken, and an understanding of the risks being incurred, before relinquishing command and control over an IAS which possesses no lethal force capabilities, but whose autonomous operation could result in a lethal outcome via
some secondary affect?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.2b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2b</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2c</IRI>
<Literal>Has the commander acknowledged to his or her supporting Staff Judge Advocate, before relinquishing command and control of the IAS, that by doing so he or she is not relinquishing accountability for the outcomes of its actions?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.2c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2c</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2d</IRI>
<Literal>Does the commander have a checklist of conditions that must be met, risk mitigation steps that have been taken, and an understanding of the risks being incurred, before relinquishing command and control over an IAS capable of selecting targets and applying lethal force to them?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.2d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.2d</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS verify that a request for transfer of command and control is from a human operator who is authorized to do so?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3a</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3b</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS determine when command and control has been transferred?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTransferred</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3b</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3c</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS notified when the commander delegates control, to include target
engagement authority, to a subordinate commander?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3c</IRI>
<Literal>page 68</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3d</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS transfer control back to a commander, or between commanders safely and in a manner that does not result in any lapses?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3d</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3e</IRI>
<Literal>Can transfer of IAS control result in a loss of command and control, and can the transfer be delayed until a time when that possibility is at an acceptable minimum?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossC2</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3e</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3f</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS default to a minimal risk operating condition in the event that transfer of command and control was not successful?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3f</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3f</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3f</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3g</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS detect the absence or unavailability of a human operator before transferring command and control and default to a minimal risk operating condition until the human operator becomes available?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3g</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3g</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3g</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3h</IRI>
<Literal>Can transfer of command and control of the IAS occur between coalition and allied forces?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.3h</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3h</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.3h</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS recognize and cease the conduct of emergent behaviors?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4a</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4b</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS prohibited from learning during operations where there is no human in the loop?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4b</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4c</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS still learn but refrain from modifying behavior until evaluated by a human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4c</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4d</IRI>
<Literal>Are commanders made aware of IAS under their command that have the ability to learn during operations and execute emergent behaviors based on incoming sensor data?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4d</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4e</IRI>
<Literal>Do commanders understand the potential occurrence of emergent behaviors with the IAS, based on its type and implementation of autonomous decisions?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4e</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4f</IRI>
<Literal>Are thresholds identified and set to alert the commander to the existence and nature of emergent behaviors?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4f</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4f</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4f</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4g</IRI>
<Literal>Can the commander limit the ability of the IAS to learn during operations and exhibit emergent behavior?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4g</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4g</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4g</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4h</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS notify the commander when it alters its operating code?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4h</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4h</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4h</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4i</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS retain a record of every action it has ever taken and notify the commander when it is about to take an action that deviates from previous actions by a predefined threshold or standard?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4i</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4i</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:seeAlso"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4i</IRI>
<Literal></Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:seeAlso"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4i</IRI>
<Literal>TODO Need to split this compound risk element. https://gitlab.nps.edu/Savage/EthicalControl/-/issues/1</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4i</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4j</IRI>
<Literal>Is the IAS susceptible to misread the environment and mismatch the appropriate action (e.g., come across a different environment but take the same action it has done before)?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.4j</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4j</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.4j</IRI>
<Literal>page 69</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), continue autonomously to execute the most recent mission or task instruction if that is the safest option?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5a</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5b</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), hold speed and course or loiter to await re-establishment of command and control?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5b</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5c</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), abort mission and return to base?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5c</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5c</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5c_IasAbortMission</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5c</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5d</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), initiate emergency (and possibly non-secure)
communications to receive further instructions?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5d</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5d</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5d</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5e</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), destroy itself?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5e</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5e</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5e</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5f</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomous selection and engagement of individual targets that have not been previously selected by an authorized human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5f</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5f</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5f</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5g</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomous selection and engagement of specific target groups that have not been previously selected by an authorized human operator?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5g</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5g</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5g</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5h</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomously making any hostile and/or targeting decision whatsoever?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5h</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5h</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5h</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5i</IRI>
<Literal>Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), follow the original human intent regarding target selection?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5i</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5i</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5i</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5j</IRI>
<Literal>Does the IAS have multiple redundancies in critical systems that enable graceful degradation of performance instead of a catastrophic loss of command and control?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5j</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5j</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5j</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5k</IRI>
<Literal>Does the IAS have internal sensors capable of detecting current or impending system failures or battle damage such that it can autonomously switch to an appropriate redundant backup system?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.5k</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5k</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.5k</IRI>
<Literal>page 70</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6a</IRI>
<Literal>Can the human operator verify that he/she has re-established command and control to prevent an IAS from continuing to execute failsafe protocols?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.6a</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6a</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6a</IRI>
<Literal>page 71</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:comment"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6b</IRI>
<Literal>Does the IAS immediately alert emergency service providers and recovery crews in the event of a collision or malfunction who can verify safe operating condition before returning the IAS to service?</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="rdfs:label"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew</IRI>
- <Literal>RE05.6b</Literal>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6b</IRI>
+ <Literal>RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationProperty abbreviatedIRI="owl:versionInfo"/>
- <IRI>#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew</IRI>
+ <IRI>#RE05.6b</IRI>
<Literal>page 71</Literal>
</AnnotationAssertion>
<AnnotationAssertion>
diff --git a/test.MeoDadmNamingRulesVerification.log.txt b/test.MeoDadmNamingRulesVerification.log.txt
index 88b62fdb14157b988bfb21928c3a10edcba9afdf..810e24f1e0adeee1fe401cbb76baecfc181941fa 100644
--- a/test.MeoDadmNamingRulesVerification.log.txt
+++ b/test.MeoDadmNamingRulesVerification.log.txt
@@ -14,909 +14,896 @@ Class IRI='#DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking'
rdfs:label (missing)
owl:versionInfo DRM-2021-U-030642-1Rev
rdfs:comment "Abstract
-This study identifies the dimensions of autonomous decision-making (DADMs), namely the categories and causes of potential risk that one should consider before transferring decision-making capabilities to an intelligent autonomous system (IAS). The objective of this study was to provide some of the tools needed to implement existing policies with respect to the legal, ethical, and militarily effective use of IAS. These tools help to identify and either mitigate or accept the risks associated with the use of IAS that might result in a negative outcome. The 13 identified DADMs were developed from a comprehensive list of 565 “risk elements" drawn from hundreds of documents authored by parties in favor of, and opposed to, the use of autonomy technology in weapons systems. We record these elements in the form of a question so that they can be used by the acquisition community to develop requirements documents that ensure the ethical use of autonomous systems, and be used by military commanders as a risk assessment checklist to ensure that autonomous systems are not used in an unethical manner. In this way, the Department of Defense can make fully-informed risk assessment decisions before developing or deploying autonomous systems."
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
+This study identifies the dimensions of autonomous decision-making (DADMs), namely the categories and causes of potential risk that one should consider before transferring decision-making capabilities to an intelligent autonomous system (IAS). The objective of this study was to provide some of the tools needed to implement existing policies with respect to the legal, ethical, and militarily effective use of IAS. These tools help to identify and either mitigate or accept the risks associated with the use of IAS that might result in a negative outcome. The 13 identified DADMs were developed from a comprehensive list of 565 "risk elements" drawn from hundreds of documents authored by parties in favor of, and opposed to, the use of autonomy technology in weapons systems. We record these elements in the form of a question so that they can be used by the acquisition community to develop requirements documents that ensure the ethical use of autonomous systems, and be used by military commanders as a risk assessment checklist to ensure that autonomous systems are not used in an unethical manner. In this way, the Department of Defense can make fully-informed risk assessment decisions before developing or deploying autonomous systems."
-Class IRI='#DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts'
+Class IRI='#DADM01'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM01 *** error, IRI #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts is longer than rdfs:label DADM01, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
owl:versionInfo page 16, page 59
rdfs:comment "Are all parties (developers, decision-makers, commanders, and operators) using a common and agreed-upon IAS lexicon so as not to inadvertently introduce risk via miscommunication?
As the number of organizations developing IAS grows, the need for common definitions and consistency in the semantics that characterize IAS concepts also grows. The main objective of this DADM is to identify terms that, if misunderstood or miscommunicated, could lead to increased risk in the use of an IAS. It is especially important for all persons involved in the life cycle of an IAS (e.g., designers, developers, operators) to take a consistent approach in defining the terms to prevent risks that can inadvertently result in mishaps. Terms that require particular attention are those that are highly subjective and strongly depend on user interpretation and situational context. Consistency is not only important among the different people involved but also across the different phases of military operations. Having standard semantics and concepts may not completely eliminate risk, but reduces the risk of the operator misusing an IAS because of a miscommunication of the designer's original intention."
-Class IRI='#DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability
- rdfs:label DADM02.1 *** error, IRI #DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations is longer than rdfs:label DADM02.1, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM02'
+ owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
+ rdfs:label DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability
+ owl:versionInfo page 16, page 60
+ rdfs:comment "For every point in time during an operation, and for every component that may be used16 during that operation, is there a human who understands how the component functions, is aware of any autonomous functionality within the component, understands the risks associated with its use, and is legally accountable for authorizing its use?
+Autonomous functionality can exist in every link of the kill chain, not just at the pinnacle of the decision to apply lethal force. Similarly, autonomous functionality can exist in every precursor activity of a nonlethal autonomous decision aid. Perceived gaps in accountability magnify legal and ethical concerns in the debate on IAS. Ensuring the continuity of legal accountability through every phase of an operation and amongst every interaction between the subcomponents of the overall IAS can help alleviate these concerns."
+
+Class IRI='#DADM02.1'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02
+ rdfs:label DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations
owl:versionInfo page 60
rdfs:comment "Pre-operational phase considerations"
-Class IRI='#DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability
- rdfs:label DADM02.2 *** error, IRI #DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases is longer than rdfs:label DADM02.2, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM02.2'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02
+ rdfs:label DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases
owl:versionInfo page 61
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability
- rdfs:label DADM02.3 *** error, IRI #DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl is longer than rdfs:label DADM02.3, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM02.3'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02
+ rdfs:label DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl
owl:versionInfo page 61-62
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability
- rdfs:label DADM02.4 *** error, IRI #DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations is longer than rdfs:label DADM02.4, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM02.4'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02
+ rdfs:label DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations
owl:versionInfo page 62
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability'
- owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM02 *** error, IRI #DADM02_ContinuityLegalAccountability is longer than rdfs:label DADM02, expected more-descriptive label ***
- owl:versionInfo page 16, page 60
- rdfs:comment "For every point in time during an operation, and for every component that may be used16 during that operation, is there a human who understands how the component functions, is aware of any autonomous functionality within the component, understands the risks associated with its use, and is legally accountable for authorizing its use?
-Autonomous functionality can exist in every link of the kill chain, not just at the pinnacle of the decision to apply lethal force. Similarly, autonomous functionality can exist in every precursor activity of a nonlethal autonomous decision aid. Perceived gaps in accountability magnify legal and ethical concerns in the debate on IAS. Ensuring the continuity of legal accountability through every phase of an operation and amongst every interaction between the subcomponents of the overall IAS can help alleviate these concerns."
-
-Class IRI='#DADM03_DegreeAutonomy'
+Class IRI='#DADM03'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM03 *** error, IRI #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy is longer than rdfs:label DADM03, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
owl:versionInfo page 17, page 62
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of autonomous functionality be adjusted to accommodate different or changing degrees of risk tolerance?
The degree of autonomy exists on a spectrum from zero autonomy, in which a human executes all functions, up to full autonomy, in which an IAS executes all functions. Increasing the degree of a system's autonomy can increase the risk of an unintended negative consequence. Additionally, changes in risk tolerance come with changing situations, conditions, and commanders in any dynamic operational environment. Thus, it is advantageous to have the ability to adjust the degree of autonomous functionality to match different risk tolerances, reducing it when risk tolerance is low and increasing it when risk tolerance is high."
-Class IRI='#DADM04_NecessityAutonomy'
+Class IRI='#DADM04'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM04 *** error, IRI #DADM04_NecessityAutonomy is longer than rdfs:label DADM04, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM04_NecessityAutonomy
owl:versionInfo page 17, page 64
rdfs:comment "Does use of the IAS impart a military advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system, to include reducing the probability of collateral damage, that justifies accepting the potential risks associated with the use of the IAS?
-The role of autonomy is to extend and complement human capabilities, and it is especially valuable in situations that are “dull, dirty, or dangerous.�? Autonomous functionalities also become necessary when an IAS can perform tasks more effectively, such as decision-making at speeds beyond human capability, and when an IAS can help prevent cognitive overload. Ultimately, the potential risks that come with the use of an IAS are justified if an IAS provides a clear advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system. However, if both perform similarly, then the user may opt to use the non-autonomous system to reduce the risks regarding legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of an IAS (when and if these risks are not also present in the non-autonomous alternative)."
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace special character �? ***
+The role of autonomy is to extend and complement human capabilities, and it is especially valuable in situations that are "dull, dirty, or dangerous." Autonomous functionalities also become necessary when an IAS can perform tasks more effectively, such as decision-making at speeds beyond human capability, and when an IAS can help prevent cognitive overload. Ultimately, the potential risks that come with the use of an IAS are justified if an IAS provides a clear advantage over a non-autonomous alternative system. However, if both perform similarly, then the user may opt to use the non-autonomous system to reduce the risks regarding legal and ethical concerns associated with the use of an IAS (when and if these risks are not also present in the non-autonomous alternative)."
+
+Class IRI='#DADM05'
+ owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
+ rdfs:label DADM05_CommandControl
+ owl:versionInfo page 18, page 67
+ rdfs:comment "Has every available and practicable measure been taken by the commander to; prevent loss of command and control, relinquish command and control (but not accountability) only in the most dire of circumstances where no other option is available, ensure transfer of command and control without its loss, detect and prevent unintended behaviors, deactivate systems that demonstrate unintended behavior, i.e. to fail safe when command and control is lost, and re-establish command and control as quickly and safely as possible when it is lost due to error, miscommunication, malfunction or enemy action?
+
+One major concern with IAS is that in some critical circumstances command and control may be difficult or impossible. This DAD seeks to maintain command and control of the IAS to the greatest extent possible and practicable, mitigate against negative consequences when command and control is lost, and minimize but accept the situations where the commander must transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The risk elements under this DAD allow the commander to make a risk-informed decision to transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The commander thus remains accountable for any negative consequences that may result."
-Class IRI='#DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.1 *** error, IRI #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.1, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.1'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.2 *** error, IRI #DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.2, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.2'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.3 *** error, IRI #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.3, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.3'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.4 *** error, IRI #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.4, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.4'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.5 *** error, IRI #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.5, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.5'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05_CommandControl
- rdfs:label DADM05.6 *** error, IRI #DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl is longer than rdfs:label DADM05.6, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM05.6'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05
+ rdfs:label DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl
owl:versionInfo page 71
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM05_CommandControl'
+Class IRI='#DADM06'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM05 *** error, IRI #DADM05_CommandControl is longer than rdfs:label DADM05, expected more-descriptive label ***
- owl:versionInfo page 18, page 67
- rdfs:comment "Has every available and practicable measure been taken by the commander to; prevent loss of command and control, relinquish command and control (but not accountability) only in the most dire of circumstances where no other option is available, ensure transfer of command and control without its loss, detect and prevent unintended behaviors, deactivate systems that demonstrate unintended behavior, i.e. to fail safe when command and control is lost, and re-establish command and control as quickly and safely as possible when it is lost due to error, miscommunication, malfunction or enemy action?
-
-One major concern with IAS is that in some critical circumstances command and control may be difficult or impossible. This DAD seeks to maintain command and control of the IAS to the greatest extent possible and practicable, mitigate against negative consequences when command and control is lost, and minimize but accept the situations where the commander must transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The risk elements under this DAD allow the commander to make a risk-informed decision to transfer decision-making capabilities to an IAS. The commander thus remains accountable for any negative consequences that may result."
-
-Class IRI='#DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects'
- owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM06 *** error, IRI #DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects is longer than rdfs:label DADM06, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM06_PresenceProtectedPersonsObjects
owl:versionInfo page 18, page 71
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs'
+Class IRI='#DADM07'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM07 *** error, IRI #DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs is longer than rdfs:label DADM07, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM07_PreOperationalAuditLogs
owl:versionInfo page 19, page 78
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs'
+Class IRI='#DADM08'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM08 *** error, IRI #DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs is longer than rdfs:label DADM08, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM08_OperationalAuditLogs
owl:versionInfo page 19, page 82
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming
- rdfs:label DADM09.1 *** error, IRI #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations is longer than rdfs:label DADM09.1, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM09'
+ owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
+ rdfs:label DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming
+ owl:versionInfo page 19, page 85
+ rdfs:comment "(missing)"
+ *** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
+
+Class IRI='#DADM09.1'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09
+ rdfs:label DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming
- rdfs:label DADM09.2 *** error, IRI #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness is longer than rdfs:label DADM09.2, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM09.2'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09
+ rdfs:label DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
owl:versionInfo page 85, page 86
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming
- rdfs:label DADM09.3 *** error, IRI #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior is longer than rdfs:label DADM09.3, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM09.3'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09
+ rdfs:label DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming
- rdfs:label DADM09.4 *** error, IRI #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions is longer than rdfs:label DADM09.4, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#DADM09.4'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09
+ rdfs:label DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
owl:versionInfo page 87, page 88
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming'
- owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM09 *** error, IRI #DADM09_HumanMachineTeaming is longer than rdfs:label DADM09, expected more-descriptive label ***
- owl:versionInfo page 19, page 85
- rdfs:comment "(missing)"
- *** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-
-Class IRI='#DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy'
+Class IRI='#DADM10'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM10 *** error, IRI #DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy is longer than rdfs:label DADM10, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM10_TestEvaluationAdequacy
owl:versionInfo page 20, page 88
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation'
+Class IRI='#DADM11'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM11 *** error, IRI #DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation is longer than rdfs:label DADM11, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM11_AutonomyTrainingEducation
owl:versionInfo page 21, page 90
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent'
+Class IRI='#DADM12'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM12 *** error, IRI #DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent is longer than rdfs:label DADM12, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM12_MissionDurationGeographicExtent
owl:versionInfo page 21, page 93
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#DADM13_CivilNaturalRights'
+Class IRI='#DADM13'
owl:subClassOf #DimensionsAutonomousDecisionMaking
- rdfs:label DADM13 *** error, IRI #DADM13_CivilNaturalRights is longer than rdfs:label DADM13, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ rdfs:label DADM13_CivilNaturalRights
owl:versionInfo page 21, page 94
rdfs:comment "(missing)"
*** error, missing rdfs:comment description ***
-Class IRI='#RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
- rdfs:label RE01.a *** error, IRI #RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse is longer than rdfs:label RE01.a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE01.a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM01
+ rdfs:label RE01.a_IdentifiedTermsDevelopmentUse
owl:versionInfo page 59
rdfs:comment "Have all parties identified all the important terms being used in the development and use of the IAS that require definition?"
-Class IRI='#RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
- rdfs:label RE01.b *** error, IRI #RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology is longer than rdfs:label RE01.b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE01.b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM01
+ rdfs:label RE01.b_ConsistentDoctrinalTerminology
owl:versionInfo page 59
rdfs:comment "Are all parties (when they come from different organizations with different doctrine with respect to IAS use) using consistent and non-conflicting doctrinal terminology?"
-Class IRI='#RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
- rdfs:label RE01.c *** error, IRI #RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology is longer than rdfs:label RE01.c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE01.c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM01
+ rdfs:label RE01.c_RapidlyEmergingTerminology
owl:versionInfo page 59
rdfs:comment "Does IAS use require the use of rapidly emerging terminology that must be defined and agreed upon before use?"
-Class IRI='#RE01.d_SameDefinitions'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
- rdfs:label RE01.d *** error, IRI #RE01.d_SameDefinitions is longer than rdfs:label RE01.d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE01.d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM01
+ rdfs:label RE01.d_SameDefinitions
owl:versionInfo page 59
- rdfs:comment "Are all parties using the same definitions for “artificial intelligence,�? “intelligent autonomous systems,�? “autonomy,�? “automatic,�? and “autonomous functionality?�?"
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace special character �? ***
+ rdfs:comment "Are all parties using the same definitions for "artificial intelligence," "intelligent autonomous systems," "autonomy," "automatic," and "autonomous functionality?""
-Class IRI='#RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM01_StandardSemanticsConcepts
- rdfs:label RE01.e *** error, IRI #RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions is longer than rdfs:label RE01.e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE01.e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM01
+ rdfs:label RE01.e_PeacetimeWartimeDefinitions
owl:versionInfo page 59
- rdfs:comment "Are all parties using the same definitions for “peacetime status�? and wartime status?�?"
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace special character �? ***
+ rdfs:comment "Are all parties using the same definitions for "peacetime status" and "wartime status?""
-Class IRI='#RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02.1_PreOperationalPhaseConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE02.1a *** error, IRI #RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps is longer than rdfs:label RE02.1a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE02.1a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02.1
+ rdfs:label RE02.1a_SpatialTemporalAccountabilityGaps
owl:versionInfo page 60
rdfs:comment "Has the concept of operation been analyzed to verify that no temporal or spatial accountability gaps exist regarding the use of IAS?"
-Class IRI='#RE02.2a_HumanJudgment'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02.2_ConsiderationsOperationalPhases
- rdfs:label RE02.2a *** error, IRI #RE02.2a_HumanJudgment is longer than rdfs:label RE02.2a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE02.2a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02.2
+ rdfs:label RE02.2a_HumanJudgment
owl:versionInfo page 61
rdfs:comment "Does the IAS allow for human judgment to be exercised over the IAS during this phase while complying with the relevant rules of engagement?"
-Class IRI='#RE02.3a_TemporalGaps'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02.3_TransferCommandControl
- rdfs:label RE02.3a *** error, IRI #RE02.3a_TemporalGaps is longer than rdfs:label RE02.3a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE02.3a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02.3
+ rdfs:label RE02.3a_TemporalGaps
owl:versionInfo page 61
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS transfer command and control between entities authorized to exercise this command and control without creating any temporal gaps in accountability?"
-Class IRI='#RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM02.4_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE02.4a *** error, IRI #RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections is longer than rdfs:label RE02.4a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE02.4a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM02.4
+ rdfs:label RE02.4a_MoralBufferProtections
owl:versionInfo page 62
- rdfs:comment "Are protections in place to prevent the problem of the “moral buffer,�? where the user mentally transfers accountability for negative consequences to the machine?"
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace special character �? ***
+ rdfs:comment "Are protections in place to prevent the problem of the "moral buffer," where the user mentally transfers accountability for negative consequences to the machine?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.a *** error, IRI #RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable is longer than rdfs:label RE03.a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.a_DegreeAutonomyAdjustable
owl:versionInfo page 62
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of IAS autonomy be adjusted?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.b *** error, IRI #RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable is longer than rdfs:label RE03.b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.b_DegreeAutonomySharable
owl:versionInfo page 62
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of IAS autonomy be made known (through markings or public communications such as a notice to mariners) to supported friendly forces, to noncombatants, and/or to enemy combatants at the discretion of the operator or commander?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.c *** error, IRI #RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense is longer than rdfs:label RE03.c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.c_ReportsRightToSelfDefense
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS make it known to anyone who might be in a position to disable, board, or seize it that it has, and will exercise, its universal right to self-defense?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.d *** error, IRI #RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically is longer than rdfs:label RE03.d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.d_DegreeAutonomyAdjustableDynamically
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the commander or operator throttle the IAS to dynamically increase or decrease the degree of autonomy to adjust to the dynamics of the operational situation?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.e *** error, IRI #RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem is longer than rdfs:label RE03.e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.e_AutonomyThresholdLethalForceWeaponSystem
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Is there an established and accepted threshold degree of autonomy, that when exceeded, the IAS becomes a LAWS, where a human no longer selects the target?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.f *** error, IRI #RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets is longer than rdfs:label RE03.f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.f'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.f_DegreeAutonomyModifiableViaRuleSets
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of IAS autonomy be conditionally changed, either through predetermined rule sets, or resulting from emergent information not covered by the predetermined rules, such as the elevation of the defense condition (DEFCON)?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.g *** error, IRI #RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent is longer than rdfs:label RE03.g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.g'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.g_DegreeAutonomyMissionDependent
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of IAS autonomy for a multi-mission capable platform be chosen and/or adjusted independently for each mission?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.h *** error, IRI #RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually is longer than rdfs:label RE03.h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.h'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.h_DegreeAutonomyAdustableIndividually
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of autonomy for each autonomous function of an IAS be adjusted individually?"
-Class IRI='#RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM03_DegreeAutonomy
- rdfs:label RE03.i *** error, IRI #RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable is longer than rdfs:label RE03.i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE03.i'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM03
+ rdfs:label RE03.i_DegreeAutonomyLowestSelectable
owl:versionInfo page 63
rdfs:comment "Can the degree of IAS autonomy be selected by the IAS such that it is the lowest degree of autonomy required to accomplish the mission?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1a *** error, IRI #RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1a_IasDetermineHumanControl
owl:versionInfo page 67
- rdfs:comment "Can the IAS determine if its (possibly changing) operational environment requires “human-in-the-loop,†“human-on-the-loopâ€, or “human-out-of-the-loop†control and make that requirement known to a human operator?"
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace right-quote †with quotation mark " ***
+ rdfs:comment "Can the IAS determine if its (possibly changing) operational environment requires "human-in-the-loop," "human-on-the-loop", or "human-out-of-the-loop" control and make that requirement known to a human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1b *** error, IRI #RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1b_IasNewBehaviorsProhibited
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS prohibited from learning and executing new behaviors based on sensor inputs or data feeds received once decision-making capabilities have been transferred to it?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1c *** error, IRI #RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1c_IasConsultHuman
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "If the IAS is allowed to modify its behavior, does it consult the human operator beforehand?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1d *** error, IRI #RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1d_IasOperationInitiationProhibited
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS prohibited from initiating operation in the absence of a control link to a human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1e *** error, IRI #RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1e_IasMovingProhibited
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS prohibited from moving to a location where the control link to a human operator can be degraded or lost?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1f *** error, IRI #RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1f'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1f_HumanControlSwarm
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Is the human operator still able to provide command and control over the actions of the IAS when it is employed as part of, and can act based on the conditions within, a swarm of other IAS?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1g *** error, IRI #RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1g'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1g_HumanChooseInLoop
owl:versionInfo page 67
- rdfs:comment "Is the human operator able to choose between a “human in, on, or out of the loop?â€"
- *** error, replace left-quote “ with quotation mark " ***
- *** error, replace right-quote †with quotation mark " ***
+ rdfs:comment "Is the human operator able to choose between a "human in, on, or out of the loop?""
-Class IRI='#RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1h *** error, IRI #RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1h'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1h_CommanderManageComplexity
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Does the IAS enable the commander to determine and/or manage the symmetries/asymmetries in the level of complexity between own forces and enemy forces?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1i *** error, IRI #RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1i'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1i_HumanTerminateEngagement
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "If a situation becomes too complex or unfolds too rapidly for the human operator to comprehend, can the human operator terminate an engagement?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1j *** error, IRI #RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1j, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1j'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1j_NumberOperatorsSufficient
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Are the number of human operators available sufficient to the number of IAS requiring command and control?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1k *** error, IRI #RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1k, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1k'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1k_IasDetectEnemyControl
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect enemy attempts to wrest command and control away and notify the human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1l *** error, IRI #RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1l, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1l'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1l_IasDetectMalfunctions
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect malfunctions or out of tolerance performance conditions that could result in a loss of command and control and notify the human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1m *** error, IRI #RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1m, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1m'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1m_IasMonitorControlLink
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS constantly monitor the availability of a control link, even when not under the direct and immediate direction of the human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1n *** error, IRI #RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1n, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1n'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1n_IasProhibitedActiveMode
owl:versionInfo page 67
rdfs:comment "Can an IAS operating in a passive mode be prohibited from changing to an active mode of operation absent a direct instruction to do so by a human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1o *** error, IRI #RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1o, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1o'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1o_IasEngageEmergentTarget
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS engage an emergent target, not on any preplanned list, without validation from a human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1p *** error, IRI #RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1p, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1p'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1p_HumanRejectAutonomousDecision
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the human operator choose to reject automated decision-making capabilities at their own discretion and at any time?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1q *** error, IRI #RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1q, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1q'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1q_HumanSelectMinConfidence
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the human operator select a minimum confidence level that must be attained before the IAS can act without approval?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1r *** error, IRI #RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1r, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1r'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1r_IasForcedCheckIn
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS be made to have to check in with a human operator and be in receipt of an acknowledgement before proceeding with further actions?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1_PreventingLossOfCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.1s *** error, IRI #RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink is longer than rdfs:label RE05.1s, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.1s'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.1
+ rdfs:label RE05.1s_IasIdentifyLostLink
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS identify conditions that might cause it to lose access to the control link with the human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS
- rdfs:label RE05.2a *** error, IRI #RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited is longer than rdfs:label RE05.2a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.2a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2
+ rdfs:label RE05.2a_IasActionsLimited
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the commander selectively limit the actions that an IAS can take before relinquishing command and control over it?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS
- rdfs:label RE05.2b *** error, IRI #RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk is longer than rdfs:label RE05.2b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.2b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2
+ rdfs:label RE05.2b_CommanderUnderstandRisk
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Does the commander have a checklist of conditions that must be met, risk mitigation steps that have been taken, and an understanding of the risks being incurred, before relinquishing command and control over an IAS which possesses no lethal force capabilities, but whose autonomous operation could result in a lethal outcome via
some secondary affect?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS
- rdfs:label RE05.2c *** error, IRI #RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal is longer than rdfs:label RE05.2c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.2c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2
+ rdfs:label RE05.2c_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityNonLethal
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Has the commander acknowledged to his or her supporting Staff Judge Advocate, before relinquishing command and control of the IAS, that by doing so he or she is not relinquishing accountability for the outcomes of its actions?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2_RelinquishingCommandControlToIAS
- rdfs:label RE05.2d *** error, IRI #RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal is longer than rdfs:label RE05.2d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.2d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.2
+ rdfs:label RE05.2d_CommanderAcknowledgeAccountabilityLethal
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Does the commander have a checklist of conditions that must be met, risk mitigation steps that have been taken, and an understanding of the risks being incurred, before relinquishing command and control over an IAS capable of selecting targets and applying lethal force to them?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3a *** error, IRI #RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3a_IasVerifyRequest
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS verify that a request for transfer of command and control is from a human operator who is authorized to do so?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3b *** error, IRI #RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTrasnferred is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3b_IasDetermineControlTransferred
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS determine when command and control has been transferred?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3c *** error, IRI #RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3c_IasNotifiedControlDelegated
owl:versionInfo page 68
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS notified when the commander delegates control, to include target
engagement authority, to a subordinate commander?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3d *** error, IRI #RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3d_IasTransferControlSafely
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS transfer control back to a commander, or between commanders safely and in a manner that does not result in any lapses?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3e *** error, IRI #RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossCC is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3e_TransferCausedLossC2
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can transfer of IAS control result in a loss of command and control, and can the transfer be delayed until a time when that possibility is at an acceptable minimum?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3f *** error, IRI #RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3f'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3f_IasDefaultMinimumRisk
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS default to a minimal risk operating condition in the event that transfer of command and control was not successful?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3g *** error, IRI #RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3g'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3g_IasDetectAbsentOperator
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect the absence or unavailability of a human operator before transferring command and control and default to a minimal risk operating condition until the human operator becomes available?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3_TransferringCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.3h *** error, IRI #RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies is longer than rdfs:label RE05.3h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.3h'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.3
+ rdfs:label RE05.3h_IasControlledByAllies
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can transfer of command and control of the IAS occur between coalition and allied forces?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4a *** error, IRI #RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4a'
+ owl:subClassOf (missing)
+ rdfs:label RE05.4a_IasRecognizeEmergence
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS recognize and cease the conduct of emergent behaviors?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4b *** error, IRI #RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4b_IasLearningProhibited
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS prohibited from learning during operations where there is no human in the loop?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4c *** error, IRI #RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4c_IasModifyBehavior
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS still learn but refrain from modifying behavior until evaluated by a human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4d *** error, IRI #RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4d_CommandersAwareIasEmergence
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Are commanders made aware of IAS under their command that have the ability to learn during operations and execute emergent behaviors based on incoming sensor data?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4e *** error, IRI #RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4e_CommandersUnderstandEmergence
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Do commanders understand the potential occurrence of emergent behaviors with the IAS, based on its type and implementation of autonomous decisions?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4f *** error, IRI #RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4f'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4f_EmergenceThresholdsSet
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Are thresholds identified and set to alert the commander to the existence and nature of emergent behaviors?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4g *** error, IRI #RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4g'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4g_IasEmergenceLimitable
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the commander limit the ability of the IAS to learn during operations and exhibit emergent behavior?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4h *** error, IRI #RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4h'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4h_IasAlertsCodeChanges
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS notify the commander when it alters its operating code?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4i *** error, IRI #RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4i'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4i_IasAlertActionsDeviate
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS retain a record of every action it has ever taken and notify the commander when it is about to take an action that deviates from previous actions by a predefined threshold or standard?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4_RecognizingEmergentBehavior
- rdfs:label RE05.4j *** error, IRI #RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment is longer than rdfs:label RE05.4j, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.4j'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.4
+ rdfs:label RE05.4j_IasMisreadEnvironment
owl:versionInfo page 69
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS susceptible to misread the environment and mismatch the appropriate action (e.g., come across a different environment but take the same action it has done before)?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5a *** error, IRI #RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5a_IasContinueSafely
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), continue autonomously to execute the most recent mission or task instruction if that is the safest option?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5b *** error, IRI #RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5b_IasMaintainMotion
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), hold speed and course or loiter to await re-establishment of command and control?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5c_IasAbortMission'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5c *** error, IRI #RE05.5c_IasAbortMission is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5c'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5c_IasAbortMission
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), abort mission and return to base?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5d *** error, IRI #RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5d'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5d_IasInitiateEmergencyComms
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), initiate emergency (and possibly non-secure)
communications to receive further instructions?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5e *** error, IRI #RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5e'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5e_IasSelfDestruct
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), destroy itself?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5f *** error, IRI #RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5f'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5f_IasProhibitedSelectingTargets
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomous selection and engagement of individual targets that have not been previously selected by an authorized human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5g *** error, IRI #RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5g'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5g_IasProhibitedSelectingTargetGroups
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomous selection and engagement of specific target groups that have not been previously selected by an authorized human operator?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5h *** error, IRI #RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5h'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5h_IasProhibitedTargetingDecisions
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), be prohibited from autonomously making any hostile and/or targeting decision whatsoever?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5i *** error, IRI #RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5i'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5i_IasFollowHumanIntent
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS, in the event that command and control is lost for any reason (and based on pre-determined criteria), follow the original human intent regarding target selection?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5j *** error, IRI #RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5j, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5j'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5j_IasReduntantCCSystems
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Does the IAS have multiple redundancies in critical systems that enable graceful degradation of performance instead of a catastrophic loss of command and control?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5_FailingSafeWhenCommandAndControlsLost
- rdfs:label RE05.5k *** error, IRI #RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems is longer than rdfs:label RE05.5k, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.5k'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.5
+ rdfs:label RE05.5k_IasSwitchBackupSystems
owl:versionInfo page 70
rdfs:comment "Does the IAS have internal sensors capable of detecting current or impending system failures or battle damage such that it can autonomously switch to an appropriate redundant backup system?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.6a *** error, IRI #RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC is longer than rdfs:label RE05.6a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.6a'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.6
+ rdfs:label RE05.6a_OperatorVerifyCC
owl:versionInfo page 71
rdfs:comment "Can the human operator verify that he/she has re-established command and control to prevent an IAS from continuing to execute failsafe protocols?"
-Class IRI='#RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM05.6_ReestablishingCommandAndControl
- rdfs:label RE05.6b *** error, IRI #RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew is longer than rdfs:label RE05.6b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+Class IRI='#RE05.6b'
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM05.6
+ rdfs:label RE05.6b_IasAlertRecoveryCrew
owl:versionInfo page 71
rdfs:comment "Does the IAS immediately alert emergency service providers and recovery crews in the event of a collision or malfunction who can verify safe operating condition before returning the IAS to service?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1a'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1a *** error, IRI #RE09.1a matches rdfs:label RE09.1a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1a *** error, IRI #RE09.1a identical to rdfs:label RE09.1a, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS alert the humans that they are interacting with an IAS and not another human?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1b'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1b *** error, IRI #RE09.1b matches rdfs:label RE09.1b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1b *** error, IRI #RE09.1b identical to rdfs:label RE09.1b, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS distinguish between blue forces with human operators and other blue force IAS?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1c'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1c *** error, IRI #RE09.1c matches rdfs:label RE09.1c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1c *** error, IRI #RE09.1c identical to rdfs:label RE09.1c, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Will continued reliance on the IAS cause human operator skills to diminish such that they can no longer back up the IAS in the event that the IAS becomes unavailable?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1d'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1d *** error, IRI #RE09.1d matches rdfs:label RE09.1d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1d *** error, IRI #RE09.1d identical to rdfs:label RE09.1d, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS make decisions when incapacitated human operators cannot?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1e'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1e *** error, IRI #RE09.1e matches rdfs:label RE09.1e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1e *** error, IRI #RE09.1e identical to rdfs:label RE09.1e, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "What types of decisions is the IAS allowed to make or delegate?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1f'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1f *** error, IRI #RE09.1f matches rdfs:label RE09.1f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1f *** error, IRI #RE09.1f identical to rdfs:label RE09.1f, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect when the human operator is under too much stress to make a sound decision and unilaterally make decisions without human oversight that normally would require it?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1g'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1g *** error, IRI #RE09.1g matches rdfs:label RE09.1g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1g *** error, IRI #RE09.1g identical to rdfs:label RE09.1g, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS provide explanations of its actions and/or predictions that are
understandable by the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1h'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1h *** error, IRI #RE09.1h matches rdfs:label RE09.1h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1h *** error, IRI #RE09.1h identical to rdfs:label RE09.1h, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect human user complacency?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1i'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1i *** error, IRI #RE09.1i matches rdfs:label RE09.1i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1i *** error, IRI #RE09.1i identical to rdfs:label RE09.1i, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Is the rate of IAS false positive results known and below a previously defined and
acceptable value?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1j'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1j *** error, IRI #RE09.1j matches rdfs:label RE09.1j, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1j *** error, IRI #RE09.1j identical to rdfs:label RE09.1j, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Is the rate of IAS false negative results known and below a previously defined and acceptable value?"
Class IRI='#RE09.1k'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1_GeneralConsiderations
- rdfs:label RE09.1k *** error, IRI #RE09.1k matches rdfs:label RE09.1k, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.1
+ rdfs:label RE09.1k *** error, IRI #RE09.1k identical to rdfs:label RE09.1k, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Is there an option to turn off the IAS if there are too many false alarms?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2a'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2a *** error, IRI #RE09.2a matches rdfs:label RE09.2a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2a *** error, IRI #RE09.2a identical to rdfs:label RE09.2a, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate with all systems from which it must ingest data to achieve maximum situational awareness during the fog and friction of war?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2b'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2b *** error, IRI #RE09.2b matches rdfs:label RE09.2b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2b *** error, IRI #RE09.2b identical to rdfs:label RE09.2b, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 85
rdfs:comment "Is the IAS equipped with system selfâ€monitoring sensors that can detect and
communicate (internal) conditions that may lead to a negative outcome if not
corrected?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2c'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2c *** error, IRI #RE09.2c matches rdfs:label RE09.2c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2c *** error, IRI #RE09.2c identical to rdfs:label RE09.2c, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS predict when operational design domain conditions and constraints might be violated and communicate the future time of the violations, the probability of occurrence and the severity to a human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2d'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2d *** error, IRI #RE09.2d matches rdfs:label RE09.2d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2d *** error, IRI #RE09.2d identical to rdfs:label RE09.2d, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS and the human teammates effectively communicate their state, intent, and current problems to the other teammate?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2e'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2e *** error, IRI #RE09.2e matches rdfs:label RE09.2e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2e *** error, IRI #RE09.2e identical to rdfs:label RE09.2e, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate the current and predicted future status of fuel and
ammunition levels to the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2f'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2f *** error, IRI #RE09.2f matches rdfs:label RE09.2f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2f *** error, IRI #RE09.2f identical to rdfs:label RE09.2f, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate its current and predicted future availability for mission
execution to the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2g'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2g *** error, IRI #RE09.2g matches rdfs:label RE09.2g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2g *** error, IRI #RE09.2g identical to rdfs:label RE09.2g, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate (previously defined) system malfunctions to the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2h'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2h *** error, IRI #RE09.2h matches rdfs:label RE09.2h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2h *** error, IRI #RE09.2h identical to rdfs:label RE09.2h, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate critical messages to the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2i'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2i *** error, IRI #RE09.2i matches rdfs:label RE09.2i, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2i *** error, IRI #RE09.2i identical to rdfs:label RE09.2i, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect both sharp and gradual changes in its operational environment and provide alerts to the human operator and other systems based on criticality?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2j'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2j *** error, IRI #RE09.2j matches rdfs:label RE09.2j, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2j *** error, IRI #RE09.2j identical to rdfs:label RE09.2j, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect both sharp and gradual changes in its own performance and provide alerts to the human operator and other systems based on criticality?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2k'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2k *** error, IRI #RE09.2k matches rdfs:label RE09.2k, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2k *** error, IRI #RE09.2k identical to rdfs:label RE09.2k, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "If an IAS’s autonomous functionality fails and it must transfer command and control of itself to a human operator, will that operator have been sufficiently engaged and be able to understand the IAS’s current situation in time to safely repurpose the IAS or avert danger/loss of the IAS?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2l'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2l *** error, IRI #RE09.2l matches rdfs:label RE09.2l, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2l *** error, IRI #RE09.2l identical to rdfs:label RE09.2l, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS determine when it is inappropriate to interrupt a human operator with a query for assistance?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2m'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2m *** error, IRI #RE09.2m matches rdfs:label RE09.2m, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2m *** error, IRI #RE09.2m identical to rdfs:label RE09.2m, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS recognize the difference between rules-based decisions and
value/judgement-based decisions and query the human operator for guidance in the latter case?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2n'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2n *** error, IRI #RE09.2n matches rdfs:label RE09.2n, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2n *** error, IRI #RE09.2n identical to rdfs:label RE09.2n, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS recognize the difference between decisions based on deductive versus inductive vs abductive reasoning and query the human operator for guidance in the latter case?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2o'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2o *** error, IRI #RE09.2o matches rdfs:label RE09.2o, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2o *** error, IRI #RE09.2o identical to rdfs:label RE09.2o, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS upload and implement any doctrine or rules of engagement that identify predetermined situations where human guidance is a prerequisite to taking further action?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2p'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2p *** error, IRI #RE09.2p matches rdfs:label RE09.2p, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2p *** error, IRI #RE09.2p identical to rdfs:label RE09.2p, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS identify ambiguous or incomplete instructions and request clarification from the human operator in sufficient time to be operationally effective or to prevent mistakes/mishaps?"
Class IRI='#RE09.2q'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2_ProvisionSharedSituationalAwareness
- rdfs:label RE09.2q *** error, IRI #RE09.2q matches rdfs:label RE09.2q, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.2
+ rdfs:label RE09.2q *** error, IRI #RE09.2q identical to rdfs:label RE09.2q, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 86
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect anomalies and seek human guidance when its programming says that it is under attack, but the political situation is completely benign?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3a'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3a *** error, IRI #RE09.3a matches rdfs:label RE09.3a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3a *** error, IRI #RE09.3a identical to rdfs:label RE09.3a, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect and respond appropriately to conforming and non-conforming human behaviors?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3b'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3b *** error, IRI #RE09.3b matches rdfs:label RE09.3b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3b *** error, IRI #RE09.3b identical to rdfs:label RE09.3b, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS identify an instruction from a human operator that violates its
preprogrammed definitions of the Law of Armed Conflict, policy, or rules of
engagement, not carry out the instruction, and provide a reason to the human operator for not doing so?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3c'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3c *** error, IRI #RE09.3c matches rdfs:label RE09.3c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3c *** error, IRI #RE09.3c identical to rdfs:label RE09.3c, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can an IAS decision to not carry out an instruction that violates its preprogrammed definition of the Law of Armed Conflict, policy, or rules of engagement be overridden by the human operator or some other commander?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3d'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3d *** error, IRI #RE09.3d matches rdfs:label RE09.3d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3d *** error, IRI #RE09.3d identical to rdfs:label RE09.3d, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS request mission re–planning if planned mission execution violates mission success criteria, or other operational constraints (such as the crossing of a geographic border), and report detected violations to the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3e'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3e *** error, IRI #RE09.3e matches rdfs:label RE09.3e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3e *** error, IRI #RE09.3e identical to rdfs:label RE09.3e, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS perform arbitration between competing mission and navigation objectives based on constraints configured by the human operator?"
Class IRI='#RE09.3f'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3_ConformingAndNonconformingHumanBehavior
- rdfs:label RE09.3f *** error, IRI #RE09.3f matches rdfs:label RE09.3f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.3
+ rdfs:label RE09.3f *** error, IRI #RE09.3f identical to rdfs:label RE09.3f, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect situations that fall beyond its narrow application domain that
subsequently require it to contact a human operator for additional guidance?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4a'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4a *** error, IRI #RE09.4a matches rdfs:label RE09.4a, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4a *** error, IRI #RE09.4a identical to rdfs:label RE09.4a, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS determine the optimal frequency of how often they must query humans for commands and ensure that they do not miss any commands?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4b'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4b *** error, IRI #RE09.4b matches rdfs:label RE09.4b, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4b *** error, IRI #RE09.4b identical to rdfs:label RE09.4b, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS communicate with the human using natural language, gestures or haptics to ease and to accelerate information exchanges with human operators?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4c'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4c *** error, IRI #RE09.4c matches rdfs:label RE09.4c, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4c *** error, IRI #RE09.4c identical to rdfs:label RE09.4c, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS monitor the attentional focus, cognitive load, and task status of the human operator, and only communicate information that does not overburden the human operator with unnecessary or irrelevant information or tasks?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4d'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4d *** error, IRI #RE09.4d matches rdfs:label RE09.4d, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4d *** error, IRI #RE09.4d identical to rdfs:label RE09.4d, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS detect the emotional and physical state of the human operator to maximize efficiency of communications and activities?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4e'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4e *** error, IRI #RE09.4e matches rdfs:label RE09.4e, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4e *** error, IRI #RE09.4e identical to rdfs:label RE09.4e, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Can the IAS support human–machine joint training to allow an understanding to
develop between the human operator and the IAS regarding team objectives, platform roles, co–dependency relationships, and mutual expectations for competence, dependability, predictability, and timeliness?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4f'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4f *** error, IRI #RE09.4f matches rdfs:label RE09.4f, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4f *** error, IRI #RE09.4f identical to rdfs:label RE09.4f, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 87
rdfs:comment "Is the delegation of actions explicitly represented in the dialogue between the human and the machine?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4g'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4g *** error, IRI #RE09.4g matches rdfs:label RE09.4g, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4g *** error, IRI #RE09.4g identical to rdfs:label RE09.4g, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 88
rdfs:comment "Can the human modify the conditions placed on the delegated actions and/or
decisions of the machine?"
Class IRI='#RE09.4h'
- owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4_ManagingInteractions
- rdfs:label RE09.4h *** error, IRI #RE09.4h matches rdfs:label RE09.4h, expected more-descriptive label ***
+ owl:subClassOf #DADM09.4
+ rdfs:label RE09.4h *** error, IRI #RE09.4h identical to rdfs:label RE09.4h, expected more-descriptive label ***
owl:versionInfo page 88
rdfs:comment "Is there monitoring and documentation that the machine is acting within its
prescribed boundaries?"
-DADM naming verifification complete.
+DADM naming verification complete.
BUILD SUCCESSFUL (total time: 1 second)