Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Xj3D
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Savage
Xj3D
Commits
80ad53d5
Commit
80ad53d5
authored
4 years ago
by
Terry D. Norbraten
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
[Terry N.] update setIgnoreDiffuse issue in OGLAppearance
parent
23b65264
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
RELEASE_NOTES
+4
-2
4 additions, 2 deletions
RELEASE_NOTES
with
4 additions
and
2 deletions
RELEASE_NOTES
+
4
−
2
View file @
80ad53d5
...
...
@@ -141,10 +141,12 @@ Major changes since 2.1(May 22, 2014):
http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.2/Part01/components/texturing.html#ImageTexture
did not reveal a clear cut case for ignoring diffuse color when an image is
not considered grey-scale. Turns out that transparency, or the (1 - alpha)
value of the image,
is the correct
indicator of ignoring a material node's
value of the image,
might be a
indicator of ignoring a material node's
diffuse color component. Added a "hasTransparency" field to
org.web3d.image.NIOBufferImage which is set based on the type of image used
in an ImageTexture node.
in an ImageTexture node. Be that as it may, reverting the boolean flip of
!image.isGrayScale() to set ignoreDiffuse so that DEF/USE can be honored for
a single image texture.
Remove fastinfoset_1.2.9.jar as the fastinfoset was internally adopted into
the JDK sometime ago. Now using the internal version, but now need to set
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment