Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit bcc05bb4 authored by Pamela Dyer's avatar Pamela Dyer
Browse files

Update Application_examples/Small_Package_Delivery.mp

parent f45aefc1
No related branches found
No related tags found
2 merge requests!24Pamela's Merge Request: 07-23-2021,!23Pamela's Test Merge Request: 07-23-2021
...@@ -28,18 +28,17 @@ raining? Hailing?" ...@@ -28,18 +28,17 @@ raining? Hailing?"
Non-combatant Scenario 1 authored by N. Roberts (Engility) Non-combatant Scenario 1 authored by N. Roberts (Engility)
MP model authored by K. Giammarco (NPS) and D. Shifflett (NPS) MP model authored by K. Giammarco (NPS) and D. Shifflett (NPS)
Removing everything except the SCHEMA definition and the Air_Vehicle
root (line 36 and lines 114-128) and running that model subset, one can
see 6 event traces, one of which is unexpected: the Air_Vehicle drops
the payload with no vessel in sight (trace 6).
References: References:
Search terms: small package delivery; autonomous; ENSURE condition; Type 1 probability Search terms: small package delivery; autonomous; ENSURE condition; Type 1 probability
Instructions: Run for Scope 1. This model shows only two scenarios due to overloading constraints Instructions: Run for Scope 1. This model shows only two scenarios due to overloading constraints
(constraints that suppress entire branches of execution that a user (constraints that suppress entire branches of execution that a user
intended to permit). intended to permit). Removing everything except the SCHEMA definition and the Air_Vehicle
root and running that model subset, one can
see 6 event traces, one of which is unexpected: the Air_Vehicle drops
the payload with no vessel in sight (trace 6).
Scope 1: 2 traces in less than 1 sec.
==========================================================*/ ==========================================================*/
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment